Poor tree cutter guy

alien8ed · Post by **alien8ed** » September 20, 2004, 1:24 pm

My memory certainly isn't what I'd like it to be...but if it is working correctly I think it was tree related. Something inside me says that a tree branch fell on him...but it may have been that he fell out of a tree. I'm pretty confident about the tree branch thing...but who knows...I'm a little off sometimes!

=8=

All_I_Am? · Post by **All_I_Am?** » September 20, 2004, 7:25 pm

alien8ed wrote:My memory certainly isn't what I'd like it to be...but if it is working correctly I think it was tree related. Something inside me says that a tree branch fell on him...but it may have been that he fell out of a tree. I'm pretty confident about the tree branch thing...but who knows...I'm a little off sometimes!

=8=

That's unique...

-God Bless

Fried Squirrel · Post by **Fried Squirrel** » September 22, 2004, 10:43 am

alien8ed wrote:My memory certainly isn't what I'd like it to be...but if it is working correctly I think it was tree related. Something inside me says that a tree branch fell on him...but it may have been that he fell out of a tree. I'm pretty confident about the tree branch thing...but who knows...I'm a little off sometimes!

=8=

Either way, that is strange.

Fried Squirrel · Post by **Fried Squirrel** » September 22, 2004, 9:43 pm

That has to be a bad way to die.

alien8ed · Post by **alien8ed** » September 23, 2004, 10:02 pm

So my memory isn't horrible!

=8=

Post by **Paco103** » September 25, 2004, 12:01 am

GypsySpazz wrote:And these dipshits work at a higher education institution.

<i>
Subject: RE: Question regarding groundskeeper plaque
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:07:39 -0500
From: "Balek, Robert" <rmb202t@smsu.edu>

The plaque honors Greg Gardner, a groundskeeper who died while working on the Grounds crew.
</i>

I got THAT much from READING the fucking plaque, you stupid shit.

Wow. . . interesting. . . .that was kind of a "duh"

But the rest was helpful. I've been wondering about it myself.

Question thought - what's with the "TO: president@whitehouse.gov" part about in post 7?

Post by **Paco103** » September 25, 2004, 11:19 am

GypsySpazz wrote:
Paco103 wrote:Question thought - what's with the "TO: president@whitehouse.gov" part about in post 7?
I removed my own e-mail address, and put that in as a joke.

Oh - duh - and there was my stupid comment of the day.

No no - really - the president might have wanted to know what happened several years ago on this campus

rchif0 · Post by **rchif0** » September 25, 2004, 12:00 pm

GypsySpazz wrote:And these dipshits work at a higher education institution.

<i>
Subject: RE: Question regarding groundskeeper plaque
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:07:39 -0500
From: "Balek, Robert" <rmb202t@smsu.edu>

The plaque honors Greg Gardner, a groundskeeper who died while working on the Grounds crew.
</i>

I got THAT much from READING the fucking plaque, you stupid shit.

Thats my IDS teacher. ^_^

the_red_chimp · Post by **the_red_chimp** » September 26, 2004, 3:57 pm

Because he didn't answer your e-mail to your liking? Next time you make a mistake, I'll be sure to point it out.

the_red_chimp · Post by **the_red_chimp** » September 26, 2004, 4:02 pm

And ignored you, because you know, you wouldn't have been mad then, either.

Post by **Paco103** » September 26, 2004, 8:55 pm

I have to agree with Chreteau on this one. He could have sent that e-mail to someone without any connection to the outside world (other than to get and respond to that message), and gotten back THAT much information from someone that didn't even know there WAS a plaque

rchif0 · Post by **rchif0** » September 26, 2004, 10:40 pm

Honestly, were I the assistant grounds keeper to a large university AND teaching two classes, answering an e-mail about some plaque wouldn't be on the top of my list either. His "laziness" and that e-mail are totally non-exclusive to each other. Atleast he took the time to e-mail you back, whether it was upto your standards or not.

paula · Post by **paula** » September 26, 2004, 10:53 pm

OK. You seriously need to calm down and stop getting pissed about everything. You're going to give yourself a stroke.

You should be glad the guy replied to your e-mail, he didn't have to. Besides, was it THAT important to you to know how the guy died? That's kind of morbid to me. If I were that guy I wouldn't want to go into a lot of details about how someone died, either.

Stop being a jackass to everyone.

the_red_chimp · Post by **the_red_chimp** » September 27, 2004, 7:29 am

You're a hyprocritical, hypersensitive kinda guy.

rchif0 · Post by **rchif0** » September 27, 2004, 7:34 am

So. You're going to accuse her of worrying about you when she should be worrying about herself eh. There's a bunch of irony here.

Oh yeah, just a question.

. . . but don't you dare disrespect the dead.

That's downright funny. Does anyone have video?

WTF?

Also. You happened to see a plaque. You were curious what it was. You posted about it on a messageboard. People are going to post, and people are going to read it, as you posted it on a messageboard. And intentionally rummaging up 196 posts at the time of this reply makes it somewhat of an effort to avoid "reading your posts if we don't like them." ...Mmkay. SO. You post all over the place, get upset if people read your shit and don't agree with it, and then suggest that we don't read or post on a messageboard. OKAY.

I got THAT much from READING the fucking plaque, you stupid shit.

Worrying about someone else again. He has a master's in horticulture, he's not a total idiot you know.

Because he's lazy and didn't answer my question at all. I included the information he gave in my original e-mail, then asked for further details. The goddamned plaque has more information than that idiot gave. If he's too fucking lazy to answer the question, he should have just shut the fuck up.

Being quite a presumptuous prick there aren't we? Maybe he was busy worrying about the grounds. Or his young children. His wife? His two classes? Oh no he didn't have time to answer YOUR question yet takes the time to e-mail YOUR ass back and YOU call him a fucking idiot.

YOU have put yourself into a discernable situation by posting on a messageboard. If you post something that makes you look like you're having a mid-life chrisis or some sort of testicular PMS, people are going to point it out. That's what happens when you post your "opinion" online. Especially if you like to try to demean someone you don't know.

Fried Squirrel · Post by **Fried Squirrel** » September 27, 2004, 8:21 am

Chreteau wrote:What's funny is the amount of time you spent going over past posts to collect those quotes.

What other buttons can I push today?

How is that funny?

rchif0 · Post by **rchif0** » September 27, 2004, 8:35 am

Not to mention that there's a scroll-down menu at the bottom of each thread to go through the whole thing and look through posts. Or that I already had the other one open. And if you think that's a lot of work, then who are YOU calling lazy?

the_red_chimp · Post by **the_red_chimp** » September 27, 2004, 8:35 am

Chreteau wrote:What's funny is the amount of time you spent going over past posts to collect those quotes.

What other buttons can I push today?

That was the biggest, dumbest copout I've ever seen. You've been becoming consistently more annoying over the past couple weeks, and now that you've been called, you've got nothing to say for yourself. How about all the time you spend posting useless "LOOK I GOT THIS IN MY E-MAIL" messages? That probably took a lot longer than reading one quote. Idiot.