Page 1 of 1

DC cmd issue

Posted: April 11, 2005, 5:21 am
by Alex
Is there really any reason to have "DC 0" in there? Every other command has the command name on a line by itself, with DC being the sole exception. For simplicity in parsing, can we change this to one of the following:

DC
*

or

DC
0
*

Myself, I prefer the first. I don't see any reason to explicitly state that you're not sending new peers. That they're not there makes it implicitly clear enough.

Posted: April 11, 2005, 11:16 am
by Paco103
Valid point, and removes un-necessary exception checking and parsing. I think this change can be accomodated in the updated specs, which I will have posted by this afternoon.